Fix CVE-2022-1949,CVE-2024-5953

(cherry picked from commit 12831843a312861cb7a9025e118955c5904afc61)
This commit is contained in:
wk333 2024-09-12 15:57:23 +08:00 committed by openeuler-sync-bot
parent 5de01dc8cc
commit 16493bb7e9
3 changed files with 199 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ ExcludeArch: i686
Name: 389-ds-base
Summary: Base 389 Directory Server
Version: 1.4.3.36
Release: 6
Release: 7
License: GPLv3+
URL: https://www.port389.org
Source0: https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/archive/refs/tags/389-ds-base-%{version}.tar.gz
@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ Patch2: CVE-2024-1062-1.patch
Patch3: CVE-2024-1062-2.patch
Patch4: CVE-2024-2199.patch
Patch5: CVE-2024-3657.patch
Patch6: CVE-2022-1949-Fix-ACI-bypass-in-shortcut-filter-condition.patch
Patch7: CVE-2024-5953.patch
BuildRequires: nspr-devel nss-devel >= 3.34 perl-generators openldap-devel libdb-devel cyrus-sasl-devel icu
BuildRequires: libicu-devel pcre-devel cracklib-devel gcc-c++ net-snmp-devel lm_sensors-devel bzip2-devel
@ -382,6 +384,9 @@ exit 0
%{_mandir}/*/*
%changelog
* Thu Sep 12 2024 wangkai <13474090681@163.com> - 1.4.3.36-7
- Fix CVE-2022-1949,CVE-2024-5953
* Wed Jun 05 2024 wangkai <13474090681@163.com> - 1.4.3.36-6
- Fix CVE-2024-2199 and CVE-2024-3657

View File

@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
Origin: https://build.opensuse.org/projects/SUSE:SLE-15-SP2:Update/packages/389-ds/files/0001-Fix-ACI-bypass-in-shortcut-filter-condition.patch?expand=1
From 21629670b92260c64c0355d656cd106ff8b84732 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: William Brown <william@blackhats.net.au>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 10:26:00 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] Fix ACI bypass in shortcut filter condition
---
ldap/servers/slapd/back-ldbm/back-ldbm.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/ldap/servers/slapd/back-ldbm/back-ldbm.h b/ldap/servers/slapd/back-ldbm/back-ldbm.h
index 9d78ad778..7fb85f0f6 100644
--- a/ldap/servers/slapd/back-ldbm/back-ldbm.h
+++ b/ldap/servers/slapd/back-ldbm/back-ldbm.h
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ extern int ldbm_warn_if_no_db;
* The candidate list size at which it is cheaper to apply the filter test
* to the whole list than to continue ANDing in IDLs.
*/
-#define FILTER_TEST_THRESHOLD (NIDS)10
+#define FILTER_TEST_THRESHOLD (NIDS)0
/* flags to indicate what kind of startup the dblayer should do */
#define DBLAYER_IMPORT_MODE 0x1
--
2.36.1

167
CVE-2024-5953.patch Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,167 @@
Origin:
https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/commit/e269182d7a5d6d23abba86dbfe0cbadce2ea3147
https://git.almalinux.org/rpms/389-ds-base/src/commit/4a9b4e4bb82f35452e19999ed6a946d412e82619/SOURCES/0012-Security-fix-for-CVE-2024-5953.patch
From 57051154bafaf50b83fc27dadbd89a49fd1c8c36 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pierre Rogier <progier@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 13:27:10 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Security fix for CVE-2024-5953
Description:
A denial of service vulnerability was found in the 389 Directory Server.
This issue may allow an authenticated user to cause a server denial
of service while attempting to log in with a user with a malformed hash
in their password.
Fix Description:
To prevent buffer overflow when a bind request is processed, the bind fails
if the hash size is not coherent without even attempting to process further
the hashed password.
References:
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-5953
- https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-5953
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2292104
---
.../tests/suites/password/regression_test.py | 54 ++++++++++++++++++-
ldap/servers/plugins/pwdstorage/md5_pwd.c | 9 +++-
ldap/servers/plugins/pwdstorage/pbkdf2_pwd.c | 6 +++
3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dirsrvtests/tests/suites/password/regression_test.py b/dirsrvtests/tests/suites/password/regression_test.py
index 8f1facb6d..1fa581643 100644
--- a/dirsrvtests/tests/suites/password/regression_test.py
+++ b/dirsrvtests/tests/suites/password/regression_test.py
@@ -7,12 +7,14 @@
#
import pytest
import time
+import glob
+import base64
from lib389._constants import PASSWORD, DN_DM, DEFAULT_SUFFIX
from lib389._constants import SUFFIX, PASSWORD, DN_DM, DN_CONFIG, PLUGIN_RETRO_CHANGELOG, DEFAULT_SUFFIX, DEFAULT_CHANGELOG_DB
from lib389 import Entry
from lib389.topologies import topology_m1 as topo_supplier
-from lib389.idm.user import UserAccounts
-from lib389.utils import ldap, os, logging, ensure_bytes, ds_is_newer
+from lib389.idm.user import UserAccounts, UserAccount
+from lib389.utils import ldap, os, logging, ensure_bytes, ds_is_newer, ds_supports_new_changelog
from lib389.topologies import topology_st as topo
from lib389.idm.organizationalunit import OrganizationalUnits
@@ -39,6 +41,13 @@ TEST_PASSWORDS += ['CNpwtest1ZZZZ', 'ZZZZZCNpwtest1',
TEST_PASSWORDS2 = (
'CN12pwtest31', 'SN3pwtest231', 'UID1pwtest123', 'MAIL2pwtest12@redhat.com', '2GN1pwtest123', 'People123')
+SUPPORTED_SCHEMES = (
+ "{SHA}", "{SSHA}", "{SHA256}", "{SSHA256}",
+ "{SHA384}", "{SSHA384}", "{SHA512}", "{SSHA512}",
+ "{crypt}", "{NS-MTA-MD5}", "{clear}", "{MD5}",
+ "{SMD5}", "{PBKDF2_SHA256}", "{PBKDF2_SHA512}",
+ "{GOST_YESCRYPT}", "{PBKDF2-SHA256}", "{PBKDF2-SHA512}" )
+
def _check_unhashed_userpw(inst, user_dn, is_present=False):
"""Check if unhashed#user#password attribute is present or not in the changelog"""
unhashed_pwd_attribute = 'unhashed#user#password'
@@ -319,6 +328,47 @@ def test_unhashed_pw_switch(topo_supplier):
# Add debugging steps(if any)...
pass
+@pytest.mark.parametrize("scheme", SUPPORTED_SCHEMES )
+def test_long_hashed_password(topo, create_user, scheme):
+ """Check that hashed password with very long value does not cause trouble
+
+ :id: 252a1f76-114b-11ef-8a7a-482ae39447e5
+ :setup: standalone Instance
+ :parametrized: yes
+ :steps:
+ 1. Add a test user user
+ 2. Set a long password with requested scheme
+ 3. Bind on that user using a wrong password
+ 4. Check that instance is still alive
+ 5. Remove the added user
+ :expectedresults:
+ 1. Success
+ 2. Success
+ 3. Should get ldap.INVALID_CREDENTIALS exception
+ 4. Success
+ 5. Success
+ """
+ inst = topo.standalone
+ inst.simple_bind_s(DN_DM, PASSWORD)
+ users = UserAccounts(inst, DEFAULT_SUFFIX)
+ # Make sure that server is started as this test may crash it
+ inst.start()
+ # Adding Test user (It may already exists if previous test failed)
+ user2 = UserAccount(inst, dn='uid=test_user_1002,ou=People,dc=example,dc=com')
+ if not user2.exists():
+ user2 = users.create_test_user(uid=1002, gid=2002)
+ # Setting hashed password
+ passwd = 'A'*4000
+ hashed_passwd = scheme.encode('utf-8') + base64.b64encode(passwd.encode('utf-8'))
+ user2.replace('userpassword', hashed_passwd)
+ # Bind on that user using a wrong password
+ with pytest.raises(ldap.INVALID_CREDENTIALS):
+ conn = user2.bind(PASSWORD)
+ # Check that instance is still alive
+ assert inst.status()
+ # Remove the added user
+ user2.delete()
+
if __name__ == '__main__':
# Run isolated
diff --git a/ldap/servers/plugins/pwdstorage/md5_pwd.c b/ldap/servers/plugins/pwdstorage/md5_pwd.c
index 1e2cf58e7..b9a48d5ca 100644
--- a/ldap/servers/plugins/pwdstorage/md5_pwd.c
+++ b/ldap/servers/plugins/pwdstorage/md5_pwd.c
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ md5_pw_cmp(const char *userpwd, const char *dbpwd)
unsigned char hash_out[MD5_HASH_LEN];
unsigned char b2a_out[MD5_HASH_LEN * 2]; /* conservative */
SECItem binary_item;
+ size_t dbpwd_len = strlen(dbpwd);
ctx = PK11_CreateDigestContext(SEC_OID_MD5);
if (ctx == NULL) {
@@ -45,6 +46,12 @@ md5_pw_cmp(const char *userpwd, const char *dbpwd)
goto loser;
}
+ if (dbpwd_len >= sizeof b2a_out) {
+ slapi_log_err(SLAPI_LOG_PLUGIN, MD5_SUBSYSTEM_NAME,
+ "The hashed password stored in the user entry is longer than any valid md5 hash");
+ goto loser;
+ }
+
/* create the hash */
PK11_DigestBegin(ctx);
PK11_DigestOp(ctx, (const unsigned char *)userpwd, strlen(userpwd));
@@ -57,7 +64,7 @@ md5_pw_cmp(const char *userpwd, const char *dbpwd)
bver = NSSBase64_EncodeItem(NULL, (char *)b2a_out, sizeof b2a_out, &binary_item);
/* bver points to b2a_out upon success */
if (bver) {
- rc = slapi_ct_memcmp(bver, dbpwd, strlen(dbpwd));
+ rc = slapi_ct_memcmp(bver, dbpwd, dbpwd_len);
} else {
slapi_log_err(SLAPI_LOG_PLUGIN, MD5_SUBSYSTEM_NAME,
"Could not base64 encode hashed value for password compare");
diff --git a/ldap/servers/plugins/pwdstorage/pbkdf2_pwd.c b/ldap/servers/plugins/pwdstorage/pbkdf2_pwd.c
index dcac4fcdd..82b8c9501 100644
--- a/ldap/servers/plugins/pwdstorage/pbkdf2_pwd.c
+++ b/ldap/servers/plugins/pwdstorage/pbkdf2_pwd.c
@@ -255,6 +255,12 @@ pbkdf2_sha256_pw_cmp(const char *userpwd, const char *dbpwd)
passItem.data = (unsigned char *)userpwd;
passItem.len = strlen(userpwd);
+ if (pwdstorage_base64_decode_len(dbpwd, dbpwd_len) > sizeof dbhash) {
+ /* Hashed value is too long and cannot match any value generated by pbkdf2_sha256_hash */
+ slapi_log_err(SLAPI_LOG_ERR, (char *)schemeName, "Unable to base64 decode dbpwd value. (hashed value is too long)\n");
+ return result;
+ }
+
/* Decode the DBpwd to bytes from b64 */
if (PL_Base64Decode(dbpwd, dbpwd_len, dbhash) == NULL) {
slapi_log_err(SLAPI_LOG_ERR, (char *)schemeName, "Unable to base64 decode dbpwd value\n");
--
2.46.0